Getting the right balance in biocompatibility testing can be tricky, especially when considering varying patient responses. I recently worked on a project where incorporating ISO 10993 standards made a significant difference in our device’s safety profile. Would love to hear how others approach this in their own designs.
I’ve also found that adhering to > ISO 10993 standards made a significant difference in our device’s safety profile. , it can be such a long process though! When we adjusted our testing timelines to incorporate more real-world use cases, it really helped in anticipating patient responses better.
It’s so true that real-world use cases make a big difference. In a recent project, we tapped into patient feedback early on, which really helped us anticipate their responses better. Have you tried integrating any form of patient input in your testing process?